So Cal Edison is now burying 136 Chernobyl's of radioactive waste 100 feet from the ocean in thin cans. #SaveTrestles
Nuclear power on a fault line.. well a bit scary I'd say
This discussion has been going on for decades! I guess we need constant reminders of the potential danger.
make love, not war!
the comparison is 'self referential' - in that it is bananas !
Keep spreading the word....
It's a foolish statement because it trivialises whatever point he was making.
Better Question what Causes more Deaths and harms the environment . Nuclear Energy or Oil Burning Energy . Chernoble does not compare in Safety to a US Power Plant. Nuclear Power Been Used now since 1951 USS Nautilus Christened by Mrs Eisenhower. How Much Oil has Polluted our Oceans dumped By Ship or By Tapped Wells . How Much Coal has Killed Thousands of Coal Worker .CLEANEST and Most Environmentally Safe source of Energy in USA for 60 Years NUCLEAR Power. Lets Debate Both sides and Not show Scare Movies from A No Comparison Russian Power Plant
It's Chernobyl, not 'Chernoble'. We need to help you get to the right town for your next vacation in the Ukraine and not accidentally end up at a pub in London instead.http://rt.com/news/prime-time/chernobyl-exclusion-zone-tourism-219/
Indeed a thoughtful intent. Nice way of showing ugly facts.Hey Fractals, you surely know what you're writing about. ;-)
I'm very concerned about living right next to a leaking power plant. If I were home-shopping today, I would never have bought a house in a NUKE zone.
Thank you for your comment!