PRESS RELEASE
The DAB Safety Team: November 30,
2012
Media Contact: Don Leichtling (619) 296-9928 or Ace
Hoffman (760) 720-7261
Don't Gamble Our Future On Probabilities & Un-Verified Data
SCE erroneous claims about
Westinghouse and AREVA Operational Analysis (OA) as being Deterministic
Analysis are misleading, confusing and controversial. These OA’s are Actually Possibilistic
Analysis, (PA) which is nothing more than Profitganda, the
use of phony "feel good" information to sell an idea, product or
concept to the masses.
Safety analysis can
be characterized as Probabilistic, Deterministic or a combination of both known
as Possibilistic Analysis.
Deterministic Analysis Definition: Analysis of a deterministic problem, without taking the probabilities of different event sequences into account. [Source: Businessdictionary.com]
1.
Attachment 6 - Steam Generator Operational Assessment- 3.6 Summary of All OAs - The OAs (See Table
3-1) summarized in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 conclude the SIPC and AILPC are
satisfied.
Table 3-1: Edison OA Approach and Results
Comparison
OA Description
|
OA for Degradation
Mechanisms Other
Than TTW
|
TTW OA With No
Effective AVB
Supports
|
“Traditional”
Probabilistic OA
Prepared for TTW
|
Deterministic TTW
OA
|
Reference
Attachment 6 Appendix
|
Appendix A
AREVA
|
Appendix B
AREVA
|
Appendix C
Intertek APTECH
|
Appendix D
Westinghouse
|
Edison Claim
|
Probabilistic
|
Deterministic
|
Probabilistic
|
Deterministic
|
DAB Safety Team Analysis
|
Probabilistic
|
Possibilistic
(Alarming)
|
Probabilistic
|
Possibilistic (Alarming)
|
2. AREVA Attachment 6 –
Appendix B: SONGS U2C17 - Steam Generator Operational Assessment for
Tube-to-Tube Wear – page
20 - 4.2 - Operational Assessment Strategy:
The nominal distance between extrados and
intrados locations of neighboring U-bends in the same plane ranges from 0.25
inches to 0.325 inches due to the tube indexing. There are 36 U-bends in
Unit 2 SG E-088 and 34 in SG E-089 with a separation less than or equal to
0.050 inches (Design 0.25 inches, Arkansans Nuclear One Unit 2 0.35-0.50
inches). The U-bends with the smaller
separation distances are much better candidates for wear by rubbing yet do not
exhibit TTW. Contact forces,
as deteriorated by tube wear at support locations over time, will be calculated
using advanced computational techniques. This will be combined with
calculations of stability ratios to develop the probability of the
onset of in-plane fluid-elastic instability (an alarming statement because a Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) accident has
no time line), both as a function of
operating power level and operating time. The operating power and operating
time will be adjusted to provide a probability of occurrence of instability 0.05. This probability is based on
considerations and requirements described in the EPRI SG Integrity Assessment
Guidelines. Without the development of TTW, the Structural Integrity
Performance Criteria, SIPC, is
automatically satisfied to a probability greater than 0.95.
DAB Safety team Comment: This is claimed to be a Deterministic OA but
is using Probabilities. This is projecting possibilities using
probabilities. Hence this is an (Alarming) Possibilistic OA and not a Deterministic OA as claimed by SCE.
3. Westinghouse Attachment 6 – Appendix D:
Operational Assessment of Wear Indications In the U-bend Region of San Onofre
Unit 2 Replacement Steam Generators,
Page 5, Section 1- Introduction: For the SONGS application, the resulting wear
distribution after a cycle of operation is known, or can be inferred from
existing ECT data, but for any given tube, there are many parameters that
resulted in the wear
distribution that are unknown. It
can be assumed that
the tube and AVB surfaces will not have significant run-in effects for the
first cycle of operation, but even this assumption
involves a potential error of several hundred percent. Most importantly,
the tube/AVB geometry is expected to be different than the original design
intent, but all that can be inferred
with the available information is the minimum length of the dominant tube
vibration span. In the largest sense, the answer (wear distribution) is known,
but the inputs are unknown.
Foot Note 4, Page 101:
Westinghouse does not have access to the assembly procedures. The 0.12 to 0.14
dimensions are anecdotal
without verification. NOTE:
Anecdotal: Based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific
evaluation. [Source: dictionary.reference.com]
Foot Note 5, Page 102:
Westinghouse does not have access to final manufacturing or inspection details,
but anecdotal input
indicates that six-pound weights were allowed and used during AVB inspection
for consistency with AVB drawing tolerances.
DAB Safety team Comment: When you start using the words unknown,
assumed, inputs are
unknown, anecdotal
without verification and this assumption involves a potential error of several
hundred percent, then this Deterministic OA is using unknown
Probabilities and un-validated (Alarming)
Possibilities. Hence this is a Possibilistic OA and not a Deterministic OA as claimed by Edison.
4.
Enclosure 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 Return to Service
Report -Section 5.2.2 Probabilistic Risk Assessment: The differential pressure across the
SG tubes necessary to cause a rupture will not occur if operators prevent RCS re-pressurization in
accordance with Emergency Operating Instructions.
The DAB Safety Team Comment: Do Southern Californians really want to live
at the mercy of SCE’s plant operators, who will be put in the very difficult
position of operating defective steam generators that already have thousands of
damaged tubes, just so SCE can
profit (See SONGS Union Leader's letter
that the SONGS workforce thinks a restart is not safe)? Even an Ex-Plant Shift Manager said, “He was
not going to put his license on line and risk public lives because SCE
Management wants to make money by restarting a defective reactor.” The question is, how bad do these steam
generators have to be before the NRC tells SCE to pulls the plug?
The
DAB Safety Team believes that SCE’s own data proves beyond a doubt, that these already
heavily damaged replacement steam generators (RSG) should never be restarted.
Guessing
On Nuclear Safety Caused A Trillion Dollar Radioactive Eco-Disaster At
Fukushima!
Copyright
November 30, 2012 by The DAB Safety Team. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast or redistributed without crediting the DAB Safety Team.
The contents cannot be altered without the Written Permission of the DAB Safety
Team Leader and/or the DAB Safety Team’s Attorneys.
I watched via the web and heard via the telephone until the web sound started to work while submitting 20+ detailed technical questions via email to opa4.resource@nrc.gov which was the address listed on the web, but none were asked at the end...
ReplyDeleteOne bright point for me was near the very end, when the NRC did mention that they have received input from others about San Onofre and that they it was "helpful"...
All in all, I felt the NRC was very "easy" on SCE by accepting too many "we will get back to you on that" answers from them.
Update: The CA Public Utilities Comm. (CPUC) voted yesterday to grant SCE and SDG&E a retroactive rate increase that will more than cover the 1.2 Billion Dollar steam generator debacle; so any rebates to rate payers will be paid for by the rate payers themselves!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.lbreport.com/news/nov12/scerate.htm