tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7576211372200438540.post3335896168074351025..comments2023-03-09T08:47:35.181-08:00Comments on San Onofre Nuke Waste Dump Info: San Clemente Blocks Open Discussion On Nuke SafetyDarin R. McClurehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11791168645624738331noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7576211372200438540.post-45616495418070439312013-01-08T18:48:28.399-08:002013-01-08T18:48:28.399-08:00OK, hate to be a complainer, but I've got anot...OK, hate to be a complainer, but I've got another problem with this site. There is no date on this entry...and yet it begins with "for four months we've been trying to organize..." <br /><br />I mean, you are doing great work but you MUST date these articles!!! Lee Kramer https://www.blogger.com/profile/12725366402959404334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7576211372200438540.post-3159389810269868872012-10-07T12:46:11.398-07:002012-10-07T12:46:11.398-07:00Please click on the DAB Safety Team Documents tab ...Please click on the DAB Safety Team Documents tab at the top of this page for much more technical information about San Onofre!CaptDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07050270886707234885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7576211372200438540.post-4023382948735190482012-10-07T12:43:10.234-07:002012-10-07T12:43:10.234-07:00Major points against SanO remaining in operation:
...Major points against SanO remaining in operation:<br /><br />1. It is sited on Major Fault lines + the new NRC Director is a trained Geologist that knows faults.<br /><br />2. SCE sneaked the RSG phony design past the NRC review process!<br /><br />3. SCE/SanO has the worst operated reactor in the Country.<br /><br />4. SCE has a long history of major Safety violations that is the worst in the USA.<br /><br />5. SanO almost had a major nuclear accident because of bad tube designed "in-house"...<br /><br />6. Decommissioning SanO would instantly solve all the NRC SanO oversight issues.<br /><br />7. The NRC knows that if they stop SanO from restarting, the Industry will get the message, to tighten up their operations.<br /><br />8. It will make the NRC look great without making them look like they caved into the activists.<br /><br />9. Restarting even under 70% power has MAJOR RISKS, as the DAB Safety Team has already pointed out, so why take ANY chances?<br /><br />As I see it, the NRC would much rather have all its SanO problems get Decommissioned and we can help by telling them N☢ RESTARTSCaptDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07050270886707234885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7576211372200438540.post-64566496789410900902011-08-25T11:26:50.590-07:002011-08-25T11:26:50.590-07:00Imagine you are swimming in a pool when an Earthqu...Imagine you are swimming in a pool when an Earthquake hits. The pooled water starts sloshing. If strong enough the mini tsunami in the pool may hurt you. If the pool cracks, you'll sit on the dry bottom shortly. <br /><br />Same applies to the spent nuclear fuel pools. Sloshing they are built for, but when the coolant water is seeps out through cracks from a tremor well beyond the design assumptions, you can have meltdown within a few hours, outside the containment structure. So much for intrinsic safety.<br /><br />This technology appears somewhat built on hope a big shake does not come near it.<br /> <br />Personally, I trust the safety of most nuclear power plants, under one single condition: give an operation permit only if managers, owners and their immediate family agree to live within the 10 miles zone.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7576211372200438540.post-56007884390995739212011-08-25T10:27:08.792-07:002011-08-25T10:27:08.792-07:00Good girl Ella:)
Seriously, we owe it to the next...Good girl Ella:)<br /><br />Seriously, we owe it to the next generations to be cautious.Theodorahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00284693445795167752noreply@blogger.com